Ashford 5: – Week 4 – Discussion 2
Thanks to Hollywood, firearms and the forensic information associate with them has been portrayed as the key piece of evidence in many “case.” Fingerprinting is oftentimes overshadowed. Your goal is to argue the importance of fingerprinting in our cases. Discuss three specific points why fingerprint evidence is crucial to our investigation.
If your last name begins with A-L, address the following: How might you enlighten those who believe fingerprint evidence no longer has a place in forensic investigation? Support your thoughts with at least one crime case. When responding to your classmates, respond to at least one classmate who has been assigned the opposite opinion of yours.
If your last name begins with M-Z, address the following: How might you back your opinion of fingerprint evidence still having an impact in forensic science cases today? Support your thoughts with at least one crime case. When responding to your peers, respond to at least one peer who has been assigned the opposite opinion of yours.
The body of your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from this week’s required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.
Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7. Each response should be a minimum of 100 words and should include your thoughts associated with their posted information. Additionally, you are to contribute to the discussion by adding support or constructive alternatives to your classmates’ posts.